Fighting in minor hockey happens and is usually not a big deal with appropriate penalties dished out - usually involving suspensions.
But what happens when referees are not with the program, either through flawed on-ice judgment or bad position which prevents them from seeing events transpire?
And what happens when a kid trying to follow the rules and is unwilling to fight finds himself being assaulted on the ice?
It unfolded before my eyes last night as our undermanned juvenile team played in yet another lopsided recreational game. Nothing big was on the line, few really cared who won or lost. It's nothing more than an hour of exercise, little different than a high school gym class.
A forward skates after a loose puck, he's tripped by an opposing player and slides into the feet of the goalie who's come out of the net to play the puck. The goalie is upended, one of his teammates makes a b-line for the forward lying on the ice and starts tugging at his helmet cage, trying I suppose to dislodge it to better hit his face. The forward has never fought in hockey, tries to cover up and wait a seemingly long time for the adult referees to pull off his attacker.
The penalties? Both players get 5 minutes even though it was an on-ice assault, not a fight. Even though a trip resulted in the collision with the out-of-crease goalie.
The secondary penalty? Questions from teammates why the forward didn't fight back.
He didn't fight back because he was playing by the rules and trusted the referees to do the same.
Meanwhile, he's out shopping for a new cage as the one from last night is now mangled, an additional monetary penalty for wanting to play by the rules in game that's only, supposedly, about fun, friends and fitness.
Next time I see Hockey Canada's president on TV wringing his hands about declining enrolment and reaching out to kids to stay in the game, I might suggest he check with the referees and ask them why they think kids leave.